Christians often claim homosexuality is a choice regardless of whether the person is “born gay”, but what about the rare but very real cases of hermaphroditism?
A hermaphrodite may be born with male and female genitals and is neither one gender nor the other, but both.
The family usually decides the cosmetic surgery that determines which the gender the baby is to be. However, by nature of birth the child is still a hermaphrodite who has been modified to fit one gender only by artificial means.
Questions: If such a person is altered to appear male and later is attracted to male partners, is that person gay, according to Christian biases?
Doesn’t the matter of hermaphroditism (which is not at all uncommon in the animal world) rather blur the definition of what is considered “natural” in sexuality and sexual attraction?
Could it be, the question was finally asked that stumped them? Wow. I’ve impressed myself.
Create a video blog





